Information About Sathya ‘Satch’ Purcell: “Satch Purcell”
and “Sathya Purcell”
are the same person. Satch is the domain owner for “purcellacupuncture.com”
(a website where he solicits his services as an acupuncturist and herbalist). This domain name resolves to:
235 West Lincolin Ave Apt 8
Orange, CA 92865
The phone number resolves to:
Sathya Purcell (714) 998-4463 Orange, CA 92862
Taniya Purcell (714) 998-4463 Orange, CA 92862
Therefore, “Satch Purcell”
and “Sathya Purcell”
are one and the same. Also Taniya Nayani Weerasuriya Purcell signed the bogus Sai Petition
against Sathya Sai Baba.
‘Satch’ Purcell As An Acupuncturist Young Sathya Purcell As A Sai DevoteeComment:
Sathya 'Satch' Purcell (henceforth referred to 'Satch'
) is submitting a series of letters to the ExBaba website critical of Sathya Sai Baba. Therefore, this webpage will be updated accordingly.About Sharon Purcell And Sathya Sai Baba:
Sharon Purcell (now deceased) was from Tustin, California and was allegedly devoted to Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba
for 32 years before she defected due to the sexual abuse allegations leveled against him.
After her defection from Sai Baba, Sharon Purcell (Satch's mother) stated in an email to Glen Meloy that she believed Sai Baba was a "monster"
, a "demon from the astral world"
and was "concerned that the late Walter and Elsie Cowan may have ended up in an astral demon's realm"
. How's that for a sober, rational and logical argument against Sathya Sai Baba? Sharon also doubted Baba because she was in labor for 46 hours and was deeply hurt because she did not get an interview in 1991. Sharon Purcell also advocated for Tal Brooke's book, "Avatar of the Night"
(written by a Fundamentalist Christian whose stories have never
been corroborated by any
alleged witness in 30+ years). Gary Purcell divorced Sharon in 1977 (when Satch was 4 years old).
Sharon Purcell told Glen Meloy that she was prepared to spend the rest of her life exposing Sai Baba's alleged sexual molestations on innocent boys and young men and prayed that other people would come forward with their stories. Sharon Purcell died on February 15th 2003 (while in her 60's) of Lou Gehrig's disease and left no original
articles or words against Sathya Sai Baba except a few sentences uttered on an Argentinean TV program (directed by the atheist, Alejandro Agostinelli) which said:
My Life As Sathya Sai Baba's Prophecy (Part 1)
“Well, you know what? I believed he was God… he did do one thing that I can't explain, that's why I think that he is some kind of an astral demon.”
Satch Purcell is writing a series of articles against Sathya Sai Baba in which he reinterprets his family's miraculous experiences with their former Indian Guru.
Sathya Sai Baba correctly
foretold to Barry Pittard
(when he was allegedly observing celibacy) that he would have a son several years before he actually did (Reference
). Like Barry Pittard, Sathya Sai Baba correctly
foretold to Gary and Sharon Purcell that they would give birth to a son (which occurred 2 years later). Sathya Sai Baba told Gary and Sharon to name the child after him, hence the name “Sathya Sai Purcell”
. Satch Purcell “now thinks”
(he doesn't remember) that as a toddler, he stuck a medallion that Baba materialized for him into a socket. Although a piece of the medallion was burned off (indicating it was made of metal), it mysteriously did not conduct electricity and Satya Purcell was not hurt. Regarding this experience, Satch Purcell said:
“Such instances, filtered through the pious mind, show how easy it is for Sai Baba's fame to spread by sudden leaps and bounds.”
Satch Purcell begins his Anti-Sai series with a meaningless example, citing a story he does not
even remember. I am sure that any mother who saw a flash of light, heard an electrical sound and found her toddler behind a sofa with a burned metal medallion would be thanking God profusely.
It is amusing that Sathya Purcell is attempting to reinterpret his experiences as non-miraculous when most Anti-Sai Activists
hold the view that Sathya Sai Baba does
Barry Pittard said:
“I can tell you that I and others have witnessed hundreds - and ones of the most profoundly beautiful sort - both mediated in his own person and in places far from him but in their style connected with him. My own view is this: that they are happening on a tremendously wide scale; that they cannot all be explained away as faked...From November 1975, I began to experience many profound and beautiful phenomena. Wherever I travelled in the world, they manifested far away from, yet were often clearly related to, his physical presence on the planet...I have many times experienced supranormal phenomena related to him, which there is no explaining away...Their sheer magnitude round the globe is bound to attract history’s final verdict that they are real, and do happen. (I have, by the way, found many rationalists and sceptics just as biased as many religionists)...” (Reference)
(another ex-devotee) said:
My Life As Sathya Sai Baba’s Prophecy (Part 2)
“Some of what I experienced of SSB's extraordinary and positive powers through many years is undeniable, even after the most rigorous skeptical investigations, and I do not regard him as any ordinary human being. I have simply had to realize that his actions in the worldly and human sphere are not infallible and are not always setting a perfect example for others.” (Reference)
This is Satch Purcell
’s second article in which he attempted (once again) to make the case that Sathya Sai Baba
is a lousy fraud magician whose lousy fraud magician materializations are as clear as day. Funny enough (as stated before), even some of the most vocal Anti-Sai Activists believe
that Sathya Sai Baba does
possess genuine paranormal powers. Confusingly, these critics believe that Sathya Sai Baba both
fakes and performs genuine
materializations (how’s that for being confused?). Also, it appears the ExBaba admin is enhancing Satch’s articles with Anti-Sai links because they forgot to add Robert Priddy’s link to his bogus “green diamond” claim
and left a note in the article that said “ROBERT RING XXX”
(which clearly was not
written by Satch).
Sharon Purcell told Glen Meloy that Satch Purcell:
“remembers vividly having to jump out of the way when they were still sweeping the blood from the temple later that morning” (a claim often repeated by Anti-Sai Activists)
However, Satch Purcell related his memory of the event and made no
mention to seeing any blood and claimed the mess was “cleaned up before the masses could see it”
. As a matter of fact, Satch only recalled being at Whitefield and said absolutely nothing
about being at Puttaparthi on his 1993 trip with Hal Honig!
It is clear that Satch Purcell is attempting to pick up where his mother (Sharon Purcell) left off. Deeply hurt about his mother’s premature death from a severe illness and her belief that Baba could perform genuine miracles (which made her think Baba was an astral demon), Satch Purcell is attempting to make a case against Sathya Sai Baba. The end result is that Satch’s entire
case is based on numerous hearsay claims
and attempts to convince people that Baba hid watches, necklaces, rings, vibuthi and a shiva lingam in cloth handkerchiefs hanging from the side of his chair (in full view of everyone present).
Satch Purcell never
claimed seeing Baba reach into his chair, behind his chair, etc. If anyone could hide all those items in handkerchiefs hanging from the side of a chair in full view of everyone present, that would be a miracle. Needless to say, Sathya Sai Baba’s miracles are not
limited to his person and there are literally thousands of international
claims of miracles directly attributed to Sathya Sai Baba. The following links provide some examples:Reference
Labels: satch purcell, sathya purcell, sathya sai purcell, satya purcell, sharon purcell